Logo del INTA > Página de inicio

 

Instituto Nacional
de Tecnología Agropecuaria 

Estación Experimental
Agropecuaria Balcarce

 

 

 

Principal ] Arriba ] Actividades ] Información ] Institucional ] Contactos ] Actualidad ]

Inicio > Información > Pósters

 

Effects of enzymes and herbal extracts on in vitro fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds

                          

   

D. Colombatto1,2*, A. D. Garciarena3, G. Lagos3, C. Lago4, F. Nahara4
1University of Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2CONICET, Argentina; 3EEA Balcarce INTA, Argentina; 4Porfenc SRL, Argentina

 
   

 

 

Click to enlarge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The message

 

Specific enzyme mixtures can positively affect alfalfa hay degradation in the rumen. The increases in degradation are attributable to the increased degradation of non-fibrous fractions.

Introduction

 

The use of fibrolytic enzymes and other fermentation modifiers such as herbal extracts (HE) is an emerging technology that shows promise in terms of enhancing animal performance. Moreover, they may offer an alternative to the use of antibiotics as growth promoters. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of two enzyme mixtures and a specific HE on alfalfa hay, corn silage and a total mixed ration (TMR) typical of a feedlot in Argentina.

 
   
   

Material and Methods

 

Approximately 0.5 g of pre-dried (milled to 2 mm) alfalfa hay, corn silage or a feedlot total mixed ration consisting of 70% corn grain, 20% corn silage, and 10% sunflower meal (DM basis) weighed in triplicate in 100-mL fermentation flasks (Table 1).

40 ml of anaerobic buffer and 10 ml ruminal fluid added to the fermentation flasks.

Fibrolytic enzymes supplied by Porfenc SRL (Martínez, Argentina), and added 16 h prior to inoculation with ruminal fluid.

Treatments: control (CON); two fibrolytic enzyme mixtures (denoted A and B, respectively) added at 25, 50 and 100 mg kg-1 (DM basis) (0.5X, 1X, and 2X, respectively), and an herbal extract (HE) added at 750, 1500, and 3000 mg kg-1 (DM basis).

Gas production (GP) kinetics determined at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 19, 24, 48 and 72 h post inoculation. DM and fiber degradability at 24 h also determined.

Experiment replicated on three occasions for GP, and in four occasions for degradability. MIXED Procedures of SAS used.

 
   

Table 1. Chemical composition of the feeds.

 

 

Alfalfa hay

Corn silage

Feedlot TMR

DM, g/kg

947

956

926

OM, g/kg DM

868

942

972

CP, g/kg DM

203

56

117

NDF, g/kg DM

355

446

233

ADF, g/kg DM

298

296

129

Starch, g/kg DM

43

294

597

 

 
   

Results and Discussion

 

No effects on cumulative GP were detected (Table 2), save for a quadratic trend (P=0.09) towards higher GP of corn silage treated with Enzyme A . However, enzymes A and B cubically tended to increase GP at 2 h incubation time in alfalfa hay (Enzyme A: 15.2, 19.1, 16.3 y 18.1 mL/g OM for Control, 0.5x, 1x and 2x, respectively, P=0.07; Enzyme B: 15.2, 17.5, 16.1, 16.6 mL/g OM for Control, 0.5x, 1x and 2x, respectively, P=0.09, respectively), with Enzyme B linearly increasing (P=0.05) GP at 4 h in corn silage. HE did not affect (P>0.05) GP at anytime.

Enzyme A increased Alfalfa DM DEG at 1x, but decreased that of the feedlot ration when applied at 2x (Table 3).

Because fiber DEG remained unaffected, it is suggested that non-fibrous fractions were responsible for the differences in DM DEG with
Enzyme A.

Neither addition of Enzyme B nor HE affected (P>0.05) DM DEG (Table 4).

 
   

Table 2. Cumulative gas production (mL/g OM) of ruminant feeds treated with incremental levels of two enzyme mixtures (Enzyme A and B) or a

herbal extract (HE)

 

 

Alfalfa hay

 

Control

0.5x

1x

2x

SEM

TRT
Effect,
P<

Linear,
P<

Quad.,
P<

Cubic,
P<

Enzyme A

180.2

180.2

185.3

184.3

9.01

0.89

0.57

0.79

0.69

Enzyme B

180.2

183.7

183.4

184.7

9.47

0.69

0.34

0.64

0.66

HE

180.2

179.7

177.5

180.5

6.30

0.86

0.95

0.48

0.67

 

Corn silage

Enzyme A

226.8

240.0

238.8

227.2

5.98

0.32

0.74

0.09

0.61

Enzyme B

226.8

234.1

230.1

233.7

10.15

0.92

0.69

0.85

0.64

HE

226.8

235.0

233.0

231.3

8.56

0.76

0.75

0.42

0.59

 

Feedlot TMR

Enzyme A

228.6

239.4

239.1

250.1

12.21

0.53

0.18

0.87

0.67

Enzyme B

228.6

231.4

235.9

241.9

12.01

0.85

0.42

0.98

0.95

HE

228.6

227.6

226.4

231.6

15.13

0.99

0.88

0.85

0.96

 

 
   


Table 3. Effects of Enzyme A on 24 h DM (g/kg) of

ruminant feeds

 

 

Alfalfa hay

Maize silage

Feedlot TMR

Control

 541.2

 457.7

 581.5

0.5x

534.5

441.9

551.2

1x

571.9

467.8

581.1

2x

545.7

450.6

536.7

SEM

13.5

15.33

17.33

Trt effect, P<

0.10

0.30

0.09

Linear

0.44

0.94

0.07

Quad.

0.12

0.63

0.58

Cubic

0.05

0.07

0.09

 

Click on the picture to enlarge

 



Table 4. Effects of Enzyme B or Herbal extract (HE) on 24 h

DM (g/kg) of ruminant feeds.

 

Enzyme B

Alfalfa hay

Maize silage

 Feedlot TMR

Control

541.2

457.7

581.6

0.5x

530.9

466.4

584.9

1x

540.9

444.5

571.2

2x

522.0

436.0

576.9

SEM

14.01

14.63

15.03

Trt effect, P<

0.56

0.38

0.88

Linear

0.27

0.13

0.66

Quad.

0.73

0.80

0.76

Cubic

0.46

0.34

0.54

Herbal extract

 

 

 

 

Alfalfa hay

Maize silage

Feedlot TMR

Control

541.2

457.7

583.2

0.5x

548.4

471.1

571.7

1x

554.5

459.5

535.6

2x

529.0

456.9

559.3

SEM

12.16

13.20

20.67

Trt effect, P<

0.46

0.71

0.10

Linear

0.34

0.67

0.18

Quad.

0.14

0.53

0.09

Cubic

0.78

0.37

0.30

 

 
   

Conclusions

 

Specific enzyme mixtures can positively affect degradation of selected ruminant feeds. These findings tend to confirm that responses are dose- and feed-specific.

 
            
   

 
           
 
 

 

 

© Copyright 2002. INTA EEA Balcarce. Ruta 226 km 73,5 (7620) Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tel: 02266-439100, Fax: 439101, Email: intaba@balcarce.inta.gov.ar